Tommy Wiseau - Jumping The (Big) Shark?
To many, Tommy Wiseau is a joke. To his credit, he appears to be laughing along.
Regular readers will already be au fait with my love of terrible cultural artefacts, in particular the "so-bad-it's-good" realm of cinema. So, a new film by the underwear salesman/director of The Room was a must-see, especially on it’s February 2024 debut weekend at London’s legendary Prince Charles Cinema. (No, they’re not changing the name.)
However, a new Tommy Wiseau joint brings risk. Unless your name is Neil Breen, if you make a film that audiences love to hate, the risk of losing the magic to self-awareness is high. You can find yourself leaning into the things that people took to their hearts in a way that is cynical and without the spark of art brut. This happened with Wiseau’s sitcom for Hulu, The Neighbors - 6 mirthless half-hours of badly filmed shrieking that is genuinely unwatchable. What’s more, this time he’s dipping his toe into the most self-aware of filmic trash - the “ironic” poorly animated shark film, typified by Sharknado and its equally worthless sequels. As the lights dim, my mood is pensive.
Wiseau plays Patrick, one of a trio of firefighters in New Orleans hailed a hero for rescuing some kids from a house fire. While celebrating on a fishing trip with his girlfriend, he notices something in the Mississippi River - a Big Shark (roll credits). Naturally, nobody believes him, until the streets of the Big Easy become randomly flooded with water, providing the perfect feeding ground for the Big Shark. And so, with only each other, a mysterious hobo with a map, and a dead pig, it's up to our heroic trio to save the city. Or, as Patrick, puts it,
“Our objective is to kill shark.”
How big is the Big Shark? 35 feet. That's 10 feet longer than the Spielberg's Bruce. So you know it's serious.
Obviously, this film is terrible. By any standard criteria, this is a one-star movie. As such, we must apply a different set of standards, and ask ourselves two simple questions: is it a "good bad" film, or a "bad bad" film? Has it been compromised by self-awareness?
Well, tropes from The Room are present and correct - Wiseau is the hero of the film; the acting is roundly appalling; Wiseau’s misogyny is as pathetic as ever, and the female characters have even less agency in this film than they do in The Room. Alison Bechdel would be unimpressed.
"You're occupying my brain!"
But of course, the biggest difference is the use of computer graphics, used to make rivers appear in the streets of New Orleans, leading to some truly majestic underwater swimming scenes and, of course, to create the titular Big Shark. And when Big Shark first appears - rudely interrupting a boxing match - the laugh it produced was priceless. And that was the point where my anxieties about Wiseau, for want of a better term, jumping the shark were laid to rest.
Yes reader, I can confirm that, at least with a receptive cinema audience, Big Shark is hilarious in the same way as The Room. Will it stand up to repeat viewing in the same way? Only time (and a DVD release) will tell. Has Wiseau become self-aware? Almost certainly, especially considering the lengths he’s gone to litigate an unauthorised doc about The Room out of existence. But for the 99 minutes you’re watching Big Shark (and it is 99 minutes, for there are no end credits - like Bat Pussy, we have nobody to blame but ourselves), the sheer joy one feels ultimately means… it doesn’t matter. Maybe Tommy Wiseau will have the last laugh on us all.
“Cowboys don’t cry, heroes don’t die, they just sparkle in the sky, so I won’t cry.”
During the Q&A, Wiseau mentioned that he’s planning to shoot a sequel in London. I’ll believe it when I see it. But if it happens, I’ll attempt some on-location reporting. It’s not besmirching the memory of a widely-beloved dead drummer, but it’s the best I can do.